Featured Article

.. Featured Article ..

Nominal Damages as Vindication

Sadie Blancharrd

December 1, 2022

Abstract. A recent Supreme Court decision inspired a resurgence of interest in an old mystery: How can nominal damages vindicate a plaintiff for past harm? The Court relied on the longstanding common law practice of entitling a plaintiff to sue for violation of her rights, even without…

.. Recent Articles ..

Recent Articles

Reverse Confusion and the Justification of Trademark Protection
Jeremy N. Sheff   •   30 GEO. MASON L. REV.
Abstract. Theories of private law are dominated by welfarist normative frameworks, and trademark law is no exception. One such framework—the “search costs” theory associated with the Chicago School of law and economics—has long been the primary accepted justification for trademark rights. However...
Article III Lawmaking
Micah S. Quigley   •   30 GEO. MASON. L. REV.
Abstract. On the usual view, federal common law is judge-made by definition. Commentators and courts, of course, have long recognized the tension between judicial lawmaking and the Constitution’s scheme of separated powers. That concern is part of why federal common law governs only a few special...
The Fourth Amendment in the Age of Autonomous Vehicles
Tracy Hresko Pearl   •   30. GEO. MASON L. REV.
Abstract. Autonomous vehicles exist at the intersection of two extremely turbulent areas of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence—traffic stops and emerging technologies—and have implications for virtually every major search and seizure doctrine developed over the last century. Complicating matters even...
Hugo Black and the Forgotten Role of Litigant Autonomy in New Deal Federalism
Mark Moller   •   30 GEO. MASON L. REV.
Abstract. This Article tells the lost origin story of a feature of civil procedure loathed by many progressives. That loathed feature is civil procedure’s “litigation individualism”—a term for the Supreme Court’s aggressive protection of each injured litigant’s autonomy over strategic choices...

Announcements

George Mason Law Review is pleased to share that our article, SSOs, FRAND, and Antitrust: Lessons from the Economics of Incomplete Contracts, written by Professor Joshua Wright of George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, has been cited by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in its recent opinion in FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.

• August 11, 2020

George Mason Law Review is excited to share that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas cited The Jurisprudence of the Second and Fourteenth Amendments in his dissent from the denial of certiorari in Rogers v. Grewal.

• July 15, 2020